Case Study
              
          Share this
          article 
          
            
              Seismic
              Resistant Viaduct Design for the Taiwan High Speed Rail Project
            
              - 
                
Pile-soil interaction modelling
                for High Speed Rail viaduct structures  
              - 
                
Automated viaduct model building  
              - 
                
Multi-modal spectral response
                analysis  
             
                 
              
 Faber Maunsell,
              a leading consulting firm for seismic design work, used LUSAS Bridge
              to assist in the design of seismic resistant viaduct structures
              and station guideways for Contract C270 on the Taiwan High Speed
              Rail Project. Response spectrum analysis with LUSAS determined
              forces in columns. Track-structure interaction analysis derived
              relative movements and stresses within the rails under earthquake
              loading. Nonlinear soil-structure analysis determined stresses in
              piles and pilecaps. Solid element modelling of the end-blocks for
              the proposed post-tensioning system and shell element modelling of
              the precast superstructures helped produce local bending moments.
              The end result? An economical design within a demanding project
              time-scale. 
              
                
                  
                    | 
              
               Overview 
              
              The 345km long High Speed Rail
              route runs from Taipei City in the North of the country to
              Kaohsiung City in the South. It will allow trains to travel at a
              top speed of 300 km per hour. Split into numerous design
              contracts, Contract C270 requires the design of 38km of standard
              viaducts through Changhua, Yunlin & Chiayi Counties and a
              station guideway at Yunlin. 
              On Contract C270, the viaduct is up
              to 28m high, and made up of 35m long precast post-tensioned
              concrete box girders simply supported on single columns. The deck
              units have free sliding mechanical pot bearings at each corner.
              Shear keys at either end of the span provide transverse restraint
              with one end fixed longitudinally. Bored piled foundations of 2m
              diameter and up to 60m long support the viaduct. Station guideways
              are of similar construction but with twin box-girders and RC
              portal-frame supports. 
                     | 
                    
                       
              
               
              
                      | 
                   
                 
               
              
              Analysis
              Requirements 
              
              The viaduct needed to meet three
              key requirements: strict ride performance criteria set by the
              client for normal operating conditions; remain within the elastic
              range and restrict movements to specified values during a
              significant seismic event so that a train may stop safely; and to
              support the design loads and suffer only repairable damage from
              the maximum design earthquake. To achieve these requirements four
              distinct analyses involving the use of local and global LUSAS
              models were required in order to prove the suitability of the
              design. 
              To analyse the entire 38km long
              viaduct required the creation of 70 separate models. Faber
              Maunsell
              introduced automation wherever possible to enable the analysis to
              be carried out efficiently. A Visual Basic Script was written to
              read geometric data for the viaduct, such as column dimensions,
              span lengths etc from an Excel database and built 3D beam models
              in LUSAS for the global seismic analysis and track-structure
              interaction automatically. This reduced the cost of creating new
              models and provided confidence that the models were "machine
              perfect" every time. In these models, joint elements were
              used to represent concentrated masses, foundation stiffnesses,
              bearings and shear-keys. 
                
              
              Global Seismic
              Analysis 
              
              For each model, acceleration
              response-spectrum analyses were carried out and the effects of up
              to 200 modes were combined using the CQC method. Analyses were run
              in three orthogonal directions separately and combined according
              to the project requirements. In these analyses the stiffnesses of
              the adjacent piers could vary significantly, particularly in the
              station guideways and at non-standard spans. The multi-modal
              spectral response analysis determined the seismic demand allowing
              for variation in pier stiffness, which would not have been
              possible using single-mode equivalent static calculations. From
              these global analyses column design forces were obtained and used
              for reinforcement design. 
              
                
                  
                    | 
              
               Foundation
              Analysis 
              
              For the pile and pile cap analyses
              3D beam and shell elements were used with Winkler springs
              representing the nonlinear soil-pile interaction. Patch loads
              representing forces due to plastic hinges forming in the columns
              were applied to the shell elements that modelled the pilecap. 
              The design ground acceleration in
              this contract could exceed 0.6g due to near-fault zones and the
              LUSAS analysis permitted stresses in the piles and pilecaps to be
              determined allowing for nonlinear soil behaviour. The models were
              also used to calculate the translational and rotational
              stiffnesses of the foundation which has a significant effect on
              the earthquake loads predicted by the response spectrum analysis. 
              The foundation models were used to
              obtain pile design forces and moments, and then by slicing
              sections through critical sections of the pilecap, Clarke-Nielsen
              forces were derived for reinforcement design.
               
                     | 
                    
                       
              
               
              
                      | 
                   
                 
               
              
              Track-Structure
              Interaction Analysis (TSI) 
              
              For each automatically created
              model, design response spectrum-equivalent earthquake records were
              applied to column bases in three directions simultaneously. This
              was done by using prescribed accelerations controlled with
              loadcurves. The columns were made as slender and flexible as
              possible to lengthen the structure periods and hence reduce the
              seismic demand on them. However, running contrary to this, it had
              also to be demonstrated that the substructure was sufficiently
              stiff to ensure safe operation of the railway during Taiwan's
              frequent earthquakes and to allow the safe stopping of a train
              during a seismic event should the need arise. The TSI analysis
              predicted less conservative relative movements between adjacent
              superstructures than a hand analysis, because it could allow for
              the restraint provided by the continuous welded rails. The LUSAS
              analysis also allowed direct calculation of stresses in the rails
              under earthquake loading. From the TSI analysis relative
              displacement histories for adjacent girders and stress histories
              for rails were obtained. By enveloping the results of all time
              steps maximum design values were obtained. 
              
              Superstructure
              Analysis 
              
              For the superstructure analysis
              solid modelling was required to determine stresses due to
              distortion of end diaphragms and equilibrium effects within
              anchorage zones in the precast box girders. To do this, patch
              loads representing the prestress, bearing loads and seismic buffer
              force were applied to the model. Stresses produced were integrated
              to give forces and moments at each section in the end-blocks and
              results were used for reinforcement design. 
                
              
              "The versatility of LUSAS
              Bridge coupled with the technical expertise within our Group
              helped produce an economical design for the extreme seismic
              performance criteria of the Taiwan project with its demanding
              programme and construction constraints." 
              
          
            Kandiah Kuhendran,
            Project Design Manager, Faber Maunsell 
            
              
               
          Share this
          article 
          
          
          
            
           
         
          
    Find out more
    
      
     
               
              Other LUSAS Bridge case
              studies:
              
              
              
              
              
           |