Case Study
Whitacre
Bridge
-
Integral bridge
replacement of existing masonry structure
-
3D shell and solid element
modelling
-
Post-continuity live,
earth pressure and thermal load assessments
Tony
Gee and Partners
was commissioned by Galliford-Try Rail on behalf of Network Rail
to design a road bridge at Whitacre in Warwickshire, UK, to
partially replace an existing three span brick masonry structure.
Using LUSAS Bridge, a two-span integral abutment bridge was
designed to maintain a similar load distribution on the retained
substructure as the removed arches and to also provide adequate
restraint to the central pier to withstand any train collision.
Overview
Two spans of the existing brick
masonry structure required replacement in order to provide more
vertical and horizontal clearance for modern rolling stock. Any
proposed replacement would need to be carefully detailed to meet
the stringent requirements of geometry control and clearances
posed by interface with the railway, the existing road and the
embankment. In addition, a scheme was required that could be
completed within a scheduled railway possession to minimise
disruption to train services. The
chosen solution required the demolition and removal of the
northern and central masonry arches up to the springing level. The
existing substructure and southern arch span was to be retained
and permanently propped by infill walls erected below the arch.
Bespoke precast reinforced concrete portal frames would form the
basic frame of the new two span integral abutment bridge and these
were to be seated on the existing masonry substructure at
springing level. The bridge was to be made continuous for live and
environmental loading by casting a composite insitu concrete deck
on top of the portal units. |
|
Modelling and
Analysis
In consideration of the complexity
associated with the analysis of skewed integral abutment bridges
all analysis was carried out using LUSAS Bridge. Both 3D
shell and solid modelling was employed to investigate
post-continuity service conditions. Dead, superimposed dead, live
and environmental loads were considered, particularly temperature
and earth pressure loads.
The main loadcases considered
included:
-
Post-continuity live load
effects to UK code BD 37/01
-
Temperature load effects on the
continuous structure.
-
Variation of temperature through
the thickness of the deck investigated as a nonlinear
parabolic variation.
-
Earth pressure loads on the
structure from the north abutment in accordance with UK codes
BA42/96 and BD42/00.
Train impact loading on the central
pier to GC/RC 5510 and other load effects, including temperature,
shrinkage and earth pressure on pier and abutments from
superstructure. These load effects were studied using separate
stand alone models of the masonry substructure.
Post-continuity
Live Loading
A 3D shell model was developed for
the proposed RC structure comprising the continuous skew deck
modelled with shell elements. The integral abutments and the two
piers were modelled with solid elements. It was assumed that the
RC structure is seated on the masonry substructure through pinned
supports at the abutment as well as the piers. These supports
allowed rotation at the base about the transverse axis of the
structure but no movement in any global direction. Basic load
cases to UK code BD 37/01 comprising HA and HB loading were
formulated using the Bridge Loading facility within LUSAS. The HB
vehicle was defined as a moving load and alternative travel paths
were investigated to derive the worst load effects for various
members.
Earth Pressure
Loading
While the supports were initially
idealised as pins allowing rotation of the bases, it was
anticipated that some of the rotational capacity could be
compromised over the long term due to the build up of high earth
pressures behind the abutments, degradation of the bearings and
also due to possible accumulation of debris. A spring restraint
was introduced to the rotation of the supports to further study
this scenario. Due to the ‘ratcheting’ effect of soil behind
the abutment of IABs over several seasons, earth pressures can
build up to very high values. Earth pressures were calculated in
accordance with the codes, duly accounting for locked-in thermal
strains at the time of closure as well as increased wall friction
and applied as structural loads. The structure was analysed for
lateral thrust caused by earth pressure behind the north abutment
only. On the other end the structure interfaced with the retained
masonry and did not have the benefit of any balancing earth
pressure.
Thermal Loading
For this part of the analysis the
model was upgraded with 3D solid elements replacing 3D shells to
represent the full structural depth. A thermal gradient equation
was developed in order to define a nonlinear parabolic variation
of temperature through the thickness of the deck. The key reason
for this upgrading was to gain a better understanding of the
deformations and rotations associated with this type of loading.
The ability to define a material, geometric or load variation in a
structural model is a very powerful feature of LUSAS and is useful
in complex analytical applications.
|
|
Stress
contours from temperature loading |
Resultant
displacements from temperature loading |
Integral Abutment
Bridges
There is ample evidence to suggest that the maintenance and replacement of expansion joints in bridges is an expensive and often disruptive exercise. By eliminating joints many of the maintenance issues, such as those caused by the use of de-icing salts, can be overcome. In this respect integral abutment bridges provide a desirable solution within the span and skew ranges currently specified in BD57. TGP Principal Engineer Sameer Khan said: "Whilst integral abutment bridges promise desirable long term performance, it is important to appreciate that they come with their own set of potential maintenance issues which need to be addressed during the design by careful attention to detail. It is fundamentally important to understand the behaviour of these structures under various loading conditions particularly earth pressure ‘ratcheting’ and cyclic thermal effects which become quite complex with higher skews. In this respect it is important to develop representative analytical models of the structure so that the full implications of various load applications can be studied. Gaining a realistic estimate of the movements, rotations and deformations is as important for the design of integral abutment bridges as evaluating moments, shears and stresses".
"Detailed analysis of this
integral abutment bridge provided us with a better understanding
of the behaviour of the structure under the imposed loadings.
LUSAS made it easier for us to assess many different variations of
loading, particularly earth pressure and temperature, and also
allowed us to study them in more detail than we could have done
using alternative methods."
Sameer Khan,
Principal Engineer, Tony Gee and Partners
Find out more
about integral abutment bridge analysis with LUSAS Bridge
Find out more
|