Case Study
Share this
article
Currie Road Bridge, Borders
Railway
-
Single span
half-through steel girder railway underbridge with a 50 degree skew
-
Detailed
modelling of deck helped reduce number of bearings used, and assisted
with checks to specific design codes
-
Soil-structure
interaction modelling of piled substructure also carried out.
Currie Road Bridge
during construction
(Image courtesy of Network Rail)
The
construction phase of the Borders Railway Project is being delivered
by Network Rail in partnership with Transport Scotland, The Scottish
Borders Council, Midlothian Council, City of Edinburgh Council and the
contractor BAM Nuttall. Atkins,
one of the world’s leading engineering and design consultancies, was
employed by BAM as its designer and checker, and used LUSAS Bridge analysis software to assist with
its analysis and
design of five overbridges and two underbridges on the project, of
which Currie Road Bridge was one.
Overview
The 31 mile (50km) long Borders Railway is the
longest new domestic railway to be built in Britain in over a century.
Main construction works on the project began in April 2013. On completion in
2015 it will re-connect the city of Edinburgh to the village of
Tweedbank in the Scottish
Borders for the first time in over 45 years, and
offer a fast and efficient rail passenger service alternative to the congested local road
network. Its path largely follows the previous Waverley Rail route which was originally
commissioned circa 1849 and decommissioned circa 1969. As well as
requiring two tunnels and 95 existing bridges to be refurbished, the
scheme also required 42 new bridges of various types to be built. One of these new
underbridges carries the single, ballast
formation track over the transition between Currie Road and Glenfield Road in Galashiels.
This half-through steel girder bridge has an overall girder length of
39m and a highly skewed angle of 50 degrees.
|
|
Bridge
Construction
The two main girders have an overall height of
2.7m and comprise doubled 60mm thick plates for the top flanges, 55mm thick
plated bottom flanges, and 38mm thick webs stiffened with 50mm thick
U-frame web stiffeners and 35mm thick intermediate stiffeners. Owing
to
transportation restrictions each
girder was fabricated and brought to site in two lengths of around
26.6m and 12.4m, and supported on a falsework tower prior to
being welded together. At bearing supports, three sets of 50mm thick stiffeners are used in
conjunction with localised concrete infill to the inside of the girder
at this location, as based
on Network Rail standard, to facilitate waterproofing details,
maintain the ballast,
and provide the necessary
stiffness required. The filler deck comprises 356x406x287 Universal
Column section cross-beams and a 250mm thick reinforced concrete slab with
upstands that are connected to the main girder webs with studs. End
trimmer beams are welded
to the end plates, which, in turn, are welded between the end bearing
stiffeners. A 700mm wide
walkway is connected to the south side girder.
Modelling
with LUSAS
A 3D finite element model of the
superstructure was developed in LUSAS using shell elements to
represent the
main steelwork and reinforced concrete slab. The cross girder webs and
end trimmer webs were also modelled by shells, with top and
bottom flanges represented by beams with appropriate section
properties. The reinforced concrete
upstand between bearing stiffeners and jacking stiffener was
represented by solid elements, which were connected to their respective
steel elements in contact via joint elements. Structural design
was based upon a rail traffic design speed of 75mph.
Typical bridge
development model
Network Rail standard drawings for
half-through steel girder decks with a 50 degree skew angle dictate
that from 8 to 10 bearings are used. For this 'standard' design,
each main steel girder seats
onto two large bearings whereas each end trimmer is independently
supported on 2 or 3 bearings depending on the end trimmer length. By
using LUSAS, Atkins showed that by connecting the end trimmer to
the main girders, the number of bearings used could be
reduced from 10 to just 4, and this was adopted in the final design.
Model geometry and mesh
arrangement
Detail of meshing
showing end trimmer beam
A linear eigenvalue analysis was
carried out in accordance with Network Rail Standard
NR/L2/CIV/003/F1993. This document, which provides
Network Rail's instruction and guidance on the selection of the open
options/choices permitted by BS EN 1993: Eurocode - Design of Steel
Structures, does not
allow second order analysis under a CAT II check, and therefore a
critical load factor of greater than 10 was required.
Load factor modelling
The maximum twist of the track gauge
was accurately verified in accordance with BS EN 1990:2022+A1:2005
A2.4.4.2.2 using displacement contour plots. The interaction between track and
structure was considered in accordance with EN1991-2:2003 clause
6.5.4.6.1 using the simplified calculation method for a single deck
given displacement criteria.
|
|
Displacement
contour plots for particular design combinations |
Another 3D LUSAS model analysed the piled substructure. Thick shell elements modelled the abutment, wingwalls and pile cap,
and beam elements modelled the pile group. The horizontal
spring values were determined using the method set out in
"Foundation Analysis and Design 5th Ed", Joseph E. Bowles,
with additional guidance from the LUSAS technical support team.
|
|
Substructure
modelling showing displacements due to train braking loads |
In
summing up the modelling and analysis carried out, Dr Fabien Rollet, Senior
Engineer at Atkins said: "Carrying
out a superstructure and substructure interaction analysis allowing for
accidental loads and deck twist limitations in accordance with the
Eurocode and Rail standards can be extremely laborious using 2D or 3D
grillage models, and necessitates a large number of additional hand
calculations based on previous standards. Generating a full 3D finite
element model using LUSAS allowed us to complete the design rapidly and
efficiently, and optimize the section sizes with high precision."
The construction of
Borders railway is scheduled to be completed in the summer of 2015,
and the line is expected to enter service in September of the same
year.
"Carrying
out a superstructure and substructure interaction analysis allowing for
accidental loads and deck twist limitations in accordance with the
Eurocode and Rail standards can be extremely laborious using 2D or 3D
grillage models, and necessitates a large number of additional hand
calculations based on previous standards. Generating a full 3D finite
element model using LUSAS allowed us to complete the design rapidly and
efficiently, and optimize the section sizes with high precision."
Dr Fabien Rollet, Senior
Engineeer, Atkins
Share this
article
Find out more
Other LUSAS Bridge case
studies:
|
|
Software Information
|